MEASURING EFFECTIVENESS OF ISLAMIC STUDIES DISTANCE EDUCATION IN THE DIGITAL ERA AT  THE INTERNATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY (IOU) INDONESIA

Haryani Santo  Hartono

doi:10.54622/aijis.v1i1.180

Authors

Haryani Santo Hartono International Open University (IOU), Gambia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54622/aijis.v1i1.180

Keywords:

Measures of Effectiveness (MOE), distance education, digitalization of education, Islamic Studies, The International Open University (IOU) Indonesia

Abstract

International Open University (IOU) is an international accredited campus that created new breakthrough by offering the concept of distance education since its inception. IOU is a pioneer in implementing distance learning with a concentration on Islamic Studies through digital media. Entering Indonesia as the country with the largest Muslim population, IOU opened a special Indonesian language program. This study is a form of Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) of Islamic Studies distance education through digitalization at the IOU Indonesia. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The data collection techniques used were observations, interviews, and literature review. The results of the study concluded that IOU Indonesia in some cases has its own independent program, but in general it is based on the central that has all the components of distance education through digitalization except for controls for students or graduates. IOU Indonesia also fulfills the basic principles of learning Islamic Studies.

References

AcqNotes. (2021, Dec 14). Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) Tutorial. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apXVQeraLpo

Alfinnas, S. (2018, 07 29). Arah Baru Pendidikan Islam di Era Digital. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Manajemen Islam, 7(1), 804-817. doi:DOI: https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v7i1.3186

Bakri, S. (2014). Pendekatan-pendekatan dalam Islamic Studies. Dinika, 12(1), 7-16.

Cropley, A. (2022). Qualitative Research Methods: A Practice-Oriented Introduction. Bucharest: Editura Intaglio.

Dalhat, Y. (2015). Introduction to Research Methodology in Islamic Studies. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 3(2), 147-152.

de Oliveira, M. M., Periedo, A. S., & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance Education: Advantages and Disadvantages of the Poin of View of Education and Society. Dialogia, 29, 139-152. doi:DOI: 10.5585/Dialogia.n29.7661

Defense Acquisition University Media. (2022, Nov 4). What is a Measure of Effectiveness. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rELV8iUFs30

Farajollahi, M., Zare, H., Hormozi, M., Sarmadi, M. R., & Zarifsanaee, N. (2010). A Conceptual Model for Effective DIstance Learning in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 63-77.

Fojtík, R. (2018). Problems of Distance Education. ICTE Journal, 7(1), 14-23.

Galusha, J. M. (1998). Barriers to Learning in Distance Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416377.pdf.

Gershon, L. (2020, April 13). Three Centuries of Distance Learning. Retrieved from Daily JSTOR: https://daily.jstor.org/three-centuries-of-distance-learning/

Godin, V., & Terekhova, A. (2021). Digitalization of Education: Models and Methods. International Journal of Technology, 12(7), 1518-1528.

Hartono, H. S. (2022). Modernizing Distance Education System in The Digital Era: A Case Study of International Open University (IOU). Proceeding Of International Conference On Islamic Education (ICIED). 7, pp. 244-250. Malang: UIN Malang. Retrieved from http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/icied/article/view/2011

Holmberg, B. (2003). Distance education in essence. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks-und Infor-mationssysem der Universität Oldenburg.

Indonesia.go.id. (2021, August 11). Internet, Primadona Kala Pandemi. Retrieved from Indonesia. go.id: https://www.indonesia.go.id/kategori/budaya/3103/internet-primadona-kala-pandemi

King, F., Young, M., Drivere-Richmond, K., & Schrader, P. (2001). Defining Distance Learning and Distance Education. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 9(1), 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17786/.

Kiryakova, G. (2009). Review of Distance Education. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 7(3), 29-34.

Nuraini, R. (2021). Transformasi Digital Pendidikan. In H. Wijoyo, Transformasi Digital dari Berbagai Aspek (pp. 119-147). Solok: Insan Cendekia Mandiri.

Saba, F. (2000). Research in Distance Education: A Status Report. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1), 1-9.

Sitopu, Y. A. (n.d.). Digitalisasi Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from Academia: https://www.academia.edu/36458132/digitalisasi_Pendidikan_Indonesia_pdf.

Sleator, R. (2010). The Evolution of eLearning Background, Blends and Blackboard. Science Progress (1933), 319-334.

Tamm, S. (2023, Jan 11). All 10 Types of E-Learning Explained. Retrieved from e-student.org: https://e-student.org/types-of-e-learning/

Thompson, D. (2018, November 19). A Compendious History of Distance Education. Retrieved from Saylor. Org Academy: https://www.saylor.org/2018/09/blog-a-compendious-history-of-distance-education/

Tucker, S. (2001). Distance education: Better, Worse, or As Good As Traditional Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1-6.

V., K. N., & V., A. N. (2020). Digitalization of Education: Diversity of Views. International Scientific Conferene "Digitalization of Education: History, Trends and Prospects. 437, pp. 832-835. Rusia: Atlantis Press.

Wijoyo, H., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Penerapan Digitalisasi Pendidikan. In d. Hadion Wijoyo, Transformasi DIgital dari Berbagai Aspek (p. 1). Solok: Insan Cendekia Mandiri.

Yulianti, A. (2012). Komponen-komponen Pendidikan. UIKA Bogor.